Revision.... Changed my mind from sleeve to rny

sheriberi29
on 4/27/16 12:48 pm - Cleveland, TN

after speaking with my dr again and being educated more about both procedures ( I've been tossing and turning and wrestling this decision) I have decided on rny. I will have it done Tuesday morning! I'm afraid and excited 

conazza
on 4/27/16 2:06 pm
RNY on 09/23/16

Congratulations and good luck!

Lap band: 2006. Revision to RNY 9/23/2016

8/2/17: Goal Reached: 135lbs. & 115lbs lost (5'3")

Pre-op: 250, SW 242, CW 125, GW 135

Pre-op: 9lb M1: 20lb M2: 11.5lb M3: 11.9 M4: 13.4 M5: 10.8 M6: 10.2 M7: 8.1 M8: 8.4 M9: 6.5 M10: 5.7 M11: 3.5 M12: 4.3

trishr5
on 4/28/16 1:56 pm

Hi,

What was it that changed your decision?

sheriberi29
on 4/28/16 4:54 pm - Cleveland, TN

He said that the sleeve is a wonderful surgery but it is considered a high pressure system and explained it like a long slender balloon ( like the kind you make balloon animals with) they are under pressure and with my reflux and having had the band around that portion of my stomach, it would not be the safest option for me. He says the risk of a leak would greatly be elevated. He also said that sometimes the band has created damage and the place that they usually make " virgin" sleevers staple line and he would have to go around that and it would make my pouch a slightly different shape than a normal sleeve and he did not believe I would be satisfied with my progress because of these things . 

Cherie K.
on 4/30/16 4:12 pm - Hong Kong

I am being re-sleeved this week... The doctor just insists that gastric bypass is not necessary for me because "I'm not that big".  He did say the risk of leaks is greater.... I'm hoping that I won't be one of the 5%?  The doctor has been doing sleeves for over 10 years and has only had 1 leak...

sheriberi29
on 4/30/16 4:18 pm - Cleveland, TN

That is great statisticly. I'm sure you will be just fine. Good luck with your procedure. I have severe gerd that has led to ulceration which is another reason I wasn't a great candidate for the sleeve. I am considered a lightweight as well so I really was in the mind set that sleeve was less invasive and I didn't think I needed to be drastic as much as rny but realize that 72 lbs is a great enough reason to do this . Wishing you the best!

Banded 6/9/09 HW 242 LW 142 Revision 198 m 1 loss 16 lbs 182. M 2 loss 4 lbs 178. M3 loss 6 lbs 174.m4 loss 4 lbs 168. M5 gain 2 lbs 170. M6 loss 7 lbs 163 M7 loss 5 lbs 159 M8 loss 1 lb 158 M9 loss 0 M10 155 loss 3 M11 154 loss 1 M12 loss 2 152 M13 loss 3 149 M16, 17 0 loss M 18 loss 4 lbs 145 (18 months 53 lbs)

Anne O.
on 6/7/16 7:58 pm - Jacksonville, FL
Revision on 06/30/16

Why did you choose the RNY and not the mini bypass?

 

I'm curious because I also have a lap band and a plication. I found a doctor who was willing to unfold my plication and he said I could choose what I'd like to revise to and I'm having a hard time deciding. The mini bypass is supposed to have less risk because they only make one anastomosis, not two like with the rny...but... there is more risk of GERD and bile reflux with the mini. 

Anne 
314/252/175
pre-op/current/goal
5'6"

        

sheriberi29
on 6/8/16 3:04 pm - Cleveland, TN

I have suffered a lot with reflux so I needed to avoid anything with that as a possible complication . I discussed each option with my surgeon and we decided the rny was safest choice for me 

Banded 6/9/09 HW 242 LW 142 Revision 198 m 1 loss 16 lbs 182. M 2 loss 4 lbs 178. M3 loss 6 lbs 174.m4 loss 4 lbs 168. M5 gain 2 lbs 170. M6 loss 7 lbs 163 M7 loss 5 lbs 159 M8 loss 1 lb 158 M9 loss 0 M10 155 loss 3 M11 154 loss 1 M12 loss 2 152 M13 loss 3 149 M16, 17 0 loss M 18 loss 4 lbs 145 (18 months 53 lbs)

Most Active
Recent Topics
×