On May 7, 2013 at 6:00 AM Pacific Time, MuttLover wrote:
I think this is a tough one. Depending on age, excess skin, etc. how do we know what is our optimal final weight. If you think BMI is a crock, why then is it so important? Body fat seems to me to be more based in "reality".
Personally, and this may be weird, I don't have a "final" goal yet. My initial goal is to get to 160 - -which is 5 pounds below the weight I was in college. I was 197 when I got married at 25. So I have absolutely no clue what is realistic for me, given that I've never been in a normal weight range as an adult (and I'm 55 now).
What is the difference between realism and mediocrity? If you decide later on that 135 or 140 is right for you, have you then "settled for mediocrity"?
Just want to make sure that if you change your goal, you won't feel like you failed, since you clearly are AMAZING!
THANKS SO MUCH!!! Im ECSTATIC about my progress so far... so in no way can I ever feel like a failure...
I guess Im thinking of the inevitable 5-10 lbs gain once Im in maintenance... that cushion...Im in my mid 40's... Ive been as low as 130 in my adult life albeit 4 pregnancies ago...but you are right, my mind may change when I hit 150 or 140...
I think I said it here before...140 is my realistic goal...130 is my superficial goal.... I j ust know 173 ( where I am today) is far from where I want to be ( judging by the flab left around my middle)