Elizabeth N.’s Posts

Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 4:48 pm
Topic: RE: So, which so called "DS surgeons" should we avoid?
Hmmm.So Simpson is a bait and don't switch ***** who has gone anti-DS, and Schlessinger is a bait and don't switch ***** who lies from the start. Oy, hard to decide which one is worse....
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 4:31 pm
Topic: RE: So, which so called "DS surgeons" should we avoid?
Ahhhh okay. Clarify for the dumb woman then: They have BOTH misrepresented themselves as doing the DS, but one lied bigger than the other one. Yes? No? Duh EN? Who is Joyce, one of the disappointed groupies? LInks? *I know questions questions questions.....I'm just that way.....*

*mutters on the way to post button about "good enough" bull****
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 4:26 pm
Topic: RE: Paging Dr. Paul Kemmeter!
Howdy dear sir. I hope that my posting history both here and on your Facebook wall assure you that I'm your fan.

Here's my question, which I know will reach you before you get out of bed in the morning:'

Do you do a true RNY to DS revision? Yes, no, why or why not?
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 4:22 pm, edited 9/2/10 4:33 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?
Don't shoot me okay? We've had several folks come on here lately who listed him as their surgeon as revisions to "ERNY." Those folks were mega messed up, whether due to the surgery or their noncompliance or whatever.....Bottom line for here is they listed Dr. Kemmeter and the very WORST of all WLS procedures. I was very shocked to see his good name connected with that crap.

So, I'm offering Dr.K. this platform, via his happy RNY TO DS PATIENTS IF SUCH PEOPLE EXIST, or for him to post and comment himself, to talk about the mega complex RNY TO DS REVISION, IF * BIG IF * in fact he actually DOES such procedures.

In fact I just might start a new thread asking him this very question. After all, he pays big bucks to have his name on OH, He might as well speak up in plain English about his revisions.

Edited to correct a typo.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:56 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?
I'm not sure I understand you. Are you by any chance referring to Dr. John Rabkin? And if so, why?

*ducking and running*
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:51 pm
Topic: RE: Are Vitamin K levels tested in the lab?
K2. Easy peasy, except for your doc. Gotta love docs's stupidity and unwillingness to learn. Is your doc teachable? I hope so.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:43 pm
Topic: RE: DS friendly dip recipe!
Yeah I've baked it. It kinda separates and there is some liquid, but who cares?
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:38 pm
Topic: RE: So, which so called "DS surgeons" should we avoid?
Wait a minute. I just went back and read through the whole thread and Dr. Emma Patterson is mentioned nowhere. Nor is any Dr. Patterson. If you want to publish a name on this thread, do it outright, TYVM. ESPECIALLY if you are not a regular on this board. Hello?
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:34 pm
Topic: RE: So, which so called "DS surgeons" should we avoid?

Meh, she had never appeared on any DS radar that I know of here, which would mean that she doesn't do the DS.

Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:32 pm
Topic: RE: HELP! Looking for Surgeon (Mexico) for Lap Band Revision to Duodenal Switch

Re: "completing" the procedure: A Scopinaro BPD is a complete produre. The main difference (and I'm assuming this is what Darlene got but don't "know' for sure) is that in the Scopinaro BPD the  gastrectomy is horizontal rather than vertical. In other words the stomach is reduced horizontally, meaning the pylorus and surround tissue is removed.

There's no going back. It's a complete procedure. Your idea of "incomplete" or "changable" is faulty here.

It's a bad procedure. It's done only in very messed up cases. I specifically refused a Scopinaro procedure on my consent forms, along with refusing a VBG. VSG and RNY. I consider myself fortunate that my consent forms were so detailed and that I knew what those terms meant.

Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:23 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?

Well, I think he's fabulous and would recommend him hands down (and take note that I'm not his patient). But I'm trying to soft pedal my opinions and leave room for others to post their experiences, given the info that I'm oh, so forceful and bratty and suposedly force everyone around me to silence, ya know?

Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:21 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?
It will be hard to be open about your story hon, cuz there are lots of other folks who have GREAT results from him. But bottom line is that every surgeon has EVERY result. Dr. Peters is a great example of this, as I've shared here and as he has said in public: He knew he was taking a big risk to operate on me. My surgery was complicated but you'd never know it by my recovery and subsequent experience.

It's partly BECAUSE of my flawless experience that he dared to operate on Kelly Kirk....who had basically equivalent risk factors and was mega informed and chose to go forward knowing she would die for sure without surgery and maybe would die because of surgery. Kelly died, breaking many hearts, especially Joe's her husband's. But he and all her loved ones took great pains to exonerate Dr. Peters, who took her death oh, so hard.

Okay. If people just look at me, they can assume that Dr. Peters is a miracle worker. If they look just at Kelly, they can assume he's a murderer. Both ideas are wrong.

Same is true for Dr. Ungson and his many "flawless" cases compared to you. You are not bad, flawed or a failure. You are you and have your story to tell. No surgeon has all perfect outcomes. The folks who are not perfect deserve a voice, too. Tell your story in all its detail, along with how you are working out the results. Preops need to know there are no guarantees and they need to know what they are signing when they put their signatures on forms.

I know that I very carefully dictated to Dr. Peters exactly what I wanted and instructed him on what to do or not do. I crossed out big chunks of his form, edited, intialed, clarified etc. We ALL need to be this kind of thoughtful and attentive. It might mean we go under anesthesia, get sliced and diced and closed with no real changes. Or maybe we'll get something we didn't bargain for. This is important.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 3:07 pm
Topic: RE: So, which so called "DS surgeons" should we avoid?
Was it Simpson who was offering impossibilities, and did we conflate Schlesinger with him? Schlesinger is honestly against the DS, right?

I will refrain from opiniing about Dr. Deveny or Dr. Cirangle, although it hurts to bite my tongue.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 2:52 pm
Topic: RE: Here, let me break the ice for the new VSGer decisions.
Wait a minute. You do NOT match the preordained schematics. You MUST MUST MUST despise me!!!! How DARE you think independently????
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 2:49 pm
Topic: RE: Here, let me break the ice for the new VSGer decisions.
Ideed I did forget to add anything about bait and don't swtich surgeons who panic at 2.5 hours on the table and can't figure out how to speed up their **** to go to a whole switch. People who get ****** this way are a big exception to my thread. Mittens is NOT an exception, but rather an example.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 2:41 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?
Thank you. Let's hear from more Buchwald people.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 2:39 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?
I haven't heard anything bad about him yet......
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 2:39 pm
Topic: RE: And.....which DS surgeons deserve our business?
*** huggles*** You need to share your story my dear. We need to know MANY stories in this, a testimonial based source. Many folks got a "real DS" from him but you did NOT. If you are able to share the details of what happened and why not that would be very helpful. But if you don't feel up to it folks should understand this as well.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 2:28 pm
Topic: RE: Crockpot basics
Oh dear, you are woefully uneducated on the hunk-o-meat thing. Please go to http://www.beefitswhatsfordinner.com/meatcase.aspx and learn about cuts of beef and how they should be cooked.

HOWEVER, I shall give you a true native person beef and flesh tutorial.

FIRST thing to understand about hunk-o-flesh is this: Ya gotta look at the fat and bone content. Fat and bone are keys to moisture and flavor. The most fantastic such cuts of beef include porterhouse steak and prime rib, to use but two examples. Both such cuts could go straight to the grill, fat side up, and get cooked to yummy wonderfulness by almost any idiot. There's enough fat there to save any fool who pokes the meat.

Thing is, those fantastic cuts of flesh are godawful expensive--with good reason cuz there are only a few pounds of such flesh on a cow--and people panic and **** them up by over cooking or over seasoning or over working them.

Our usual pocketbook for regular wage earning people says to buy burger, flank steak, skirt steak, chuck roast, pot roast etc.... Leaner cuts of beef, which by definition require long cooking and moist heat. AKA crock pot if you aren't grilling burgers.

Notice two qualifiers: Long cooking, moist heat. These are your friends. I grew up with everything from ratty beef leftovers to nasty venison to semigood elk to horrible moose **** to bear meat we won't talk about......and it ALL got cooked with long moist heat to make it non barfworthy. We hoped. I will refrain from ranting about how gross wild meat is other than milk-soaked elk. ICK.

This little aside about wild meat **** to tell you that ANY meat can be made non barfable if you cook it right and long enough. So have hope, yes?

Back to the beef you might buy. Let's use a piece of critter from that website called a chuck pot roast, which is a typical leanish hunk-o-flesh that doesn't cause bankruptcy concerns. This piece of beast comes from the front quarter and is kinda sorta muscular and therefore kinda sorta lean. Has some fat and flavor and needs to be slow cooked to be edible. Good example piece for hunk o flesh in crockpot. Think of your shoulder when you get this hunk o flesh. Or not, but that's where it comes from

Damn, my shoulder hurts. Meh.

Oh wait, we're about beef. I gotta focus on agribusiness here. Okay, chuck pot roast. Do you want to brown this piece of beast first? If so, sprinkle him good with flour salt and pepper and press it in till the bits fall off. Heat your skillet up to almost smoking with some oil in it. Throw on hunk o flesh so it smokes and splatters and scares you on all sides. It will smell like yummy scorching meat if you do this. Most people don't do it any more, but I thought I should mention the option cuz it smells and tastes good.

Step two, with or without browning: Throw hunk o beef in crockpot. Add yummy goodies like garlic, onions, mushrooms, carrots, celery and (VERY IMPORTANT) something acidic like tomates, wine or beer. Acid is mega important for later tenderness.  One can of tomatoes, one bottle or can of beer or half a bottle of red wine is good.

Season hunk o flesh to taste. We covered that elsewhere. IMNSHO garlic is more important than anything else and should be added by the chopped cupful, but you do what you love.

Ignore hunk o flesh all day, six hours minimum, preferably eight to twelve hours.

Okay, at this point hunk o flesh is theoretically so tender even your hubby will love it, but in case he's so picky I couldn't stand him, you need to know how to cut across the grain: Pull hunk o flesh out of pot and look at him, Can you see the strings/strands? If not, get glasses, cuz this is very obvious.

You gotta cut across those strands. Take your knife, which you MUST sharpen (what? no stone or sharpener? Good Lord. Go to Joann's and get 'em sharpened and buy a stone. EEEEP. Very important for anybody owning anything more than a butter knife!!), and attack hunk o flesh across those strands. That is "across the grain" and is vitally important to ediblitlity of hunk  o flesh. If you don't see the strings, don't cut it. Call someone, anyone, like me, and send a photo and ask which way is across the grain :-p.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 1:48 pm
Topic: RE: Will you guys lub me even if.............
Lub you? Meh, might have ignored you if you hadn't thrown a tantrum at the first tiny sign of criticism of your decision. You blew that chance.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 1:45 pm
Topic: RE: HELP! Looking for Surgeon (Mexico) for Lap Band Revision to Duodenal Switch
Dr. Gilberto Ungson is the ONLY revision or DS surgeon in Mexico worth mentioning,.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 1:43 pm
Topic: RE: Crock Pot Ribs Super Easy
NO WAY I AM NOT MAKING YOU HUNGRY. That's your body telling you that you need MEAT :-D. Don't blame ME for your DS working RIGHT, y'hear?

A crazy woman bequeathed to me her sauce for smoke meat bits:

regular size jar grape jelly/jam
medium onion chopped fine
1/2 pound bacon chopped and fried
(onion fried in bacon grease)
half regular bottle ketchup
couple shakes tabasco sauce
handful of dried currants or raisins
quarter bottle cider vinegar (compared to jam and ketchup)

Cook this all together for a while till it's sauce. Use to baste meat that you are smoking.

If you don't smoke your meat, cook meat in crockpot with liquid, including acid stuff, and some liequid smoke. Serve with this sauce or pour the sauce in for the last couple hours. Think of the crazy woman getting her just desserts when you do so, cuz she needs it.
Elizabeth N.
on 9/2/10 1:37 pm
Topic: RE: Crock Pot Ribs Super Easy
BIG HUGE GRIN

Ribs? Did I hear ribs? And why, pray tell, did you have to give ribs their VERY OWN THREAD? Couldn't possibly be because they are the most marvelous yummy meat on the planet?

Yes to the wet wipes!!!

Okay, I will forgive you for hijacking my threads only IF you promise to come down here and stuff your face on my friend Norman's prime rib. When you wanna come?
×