Anyone Size 48 Bougie?
My doctor was the same. I have no idea what size he used on me. I left it up to his professional judgment ...its what I paid him for. He aims to make the stomachs about 60cc I believe but said, when I asked, that he has to look at the individule case so there is no exact answer. At my followup I will ask him more
"I have read that choosing the right size bougie is part of the proper planning. "
I don't know where you read that, but very few doctors allow you to pick your boughie size. They have a size they use and their reasons for using it and you either agree with them or you don't and go somewhere else. Sometimes you can talk them into 1 size higher -- say a 34 instead of a 32 -- but it's not like you can demand a 48 when they believe that 48 is too big and you'll be sorry later.
Btw, there is another study on boughie size where patients were followed for five years that shows that there is a difference in success rates once you get to 2 years out. The conclusion of that study is that "A removed gastric volume of <500 cc seems to be a predictor of failure in treatment or early weight regain."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18098398?ordinalpos=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel
My surgeon is the one who gave the presentation that people are talking about. He and his partner have been doing this surgery for 7 years now and they have done as much as anyone ... more than most. They found regain to be a problem when they were using the 48 f and switched to the 32 f and are getting much better results. I find the results of a couple hundred patients with each size over several years to be pretty compelling.
I don't know where you read that, but very few doctors allow you to pick your boughie size. They have a size they use and their reasons for using it and you either agree with them or you don't and go somewhere else. Sometimes you can talk them into 1 size higher -- say a 34 instead of a 32 -- but it's not like you can demand a 48 when they believe that 48 is too big and you'll be sorry later.
Btw, there is another study on boughie size where patients were followed for five years that shows that there is a difference in success rates once you get to 2 years out. The conclusion of that study is that "A removed gastric volume of <500 cc seems to be a predictor of failure in treatment or early weight regain."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18098398?ordinalpos=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel
My surgeon is the one who gave the presentation that people are talking about. He and his partner have been doing this surgery for 7 years now and they have done as much as anyone ... more than most. They found regain to be a problem when they were using the 48 f and switched to the 32 f and are getting much better results. I find the results of a couple hundred patients with each size over several years to be pretty compelling.
HW - 225 SW - 191 GW - 132 CW - 122
Visit my blog at Fatty Fights Back Become a Fan on Facebook!
Starting BMI 40-ish or less? Join the LightWeights
Yes, that's what it means.
They studied 3 groups. One had their stomachs cut with no calibrater, which resulted in large sleeve volumes. One had a calibration tube of 44 f and one had a calibration tube of 32 f.
Something my surgeon also said in one of our seminar/support group meetings is that the shape of the sleeve -- long and cylindrical -- means our stomach empties slower than those who have RnY with the egg/walnut shaped pouch and that this can contribute to a great feeling of fullness and may explain why our weight loss is as good as theirs even though they have malabsorption and we don't.
Not that this relates directly to boughie size, but it does indirectly. Plus I just thought it was interesting.
Marshall - what you are going through is pretty typical for a pre-op. It's just so hard to imagine being full/satisfied on so little food. In fact, I don't think I've ever felt "satisfied" pre-op no matter how much food I ate. It's just so different post-op and I think at some point you have to trust the process and your surgeon.
They studied 3 groups. One had their stomachs cut with no calibrater, which resulted in large sleeve volumes. One had a calibration tube of 44 f and one had a calibration tube of 32 f.
Something my surgeon also said in one of our seminar/support group meetings is that the shape of the sleeve -- long and cylindrical -- means our stomach empties slower than those who have RnY with the egg/walnut shaped pouch and that this can contribute to a great feeling of fullness and may explain why our weight loss is as good as theirs even though they have malabsorption and we don't.
Not that this relates directly to boughie size, but it does indirectly. Plus I just thought it was interesting.

Marshall - what you are going through is pretty typical for a pre-op. It's just so hard to imagine being full/satisfied on so little food. In fact, I don't think I've ever felt "satisfied" pre-op no matter how much food I ate. It's just so different post-op and I think at some point you have to trust the process and your surgeon.
HW - 225 SW - 191 GW - 132 CW - 122
Visit my blog at Fatty Fights Back Become a Fan on Facebook!
Starting BMI 40-ish or less? Join the LightWeights
Marshall
What size did you end up getting? I am a 42.
Hugs,B
What size did you end up getting? I am a 42.
Hugs,B
http://www.obesityhelp.com/group/vsgswith150ormoretogo/welcome/
46 lbs lost pre-op www.phmiracleliving.com Eat Healthy to Stay Healthy www.shrinkyourself.com
