Getting sleeved with less than 100lbs to lose?? Why?
I'll be getting sleeved with less than 100 to lose, however I am a revision from band. When I started the journey to get banded I was 309, now I'm 244. I wish I had gotten the sleeve 4 years ago instead of the band, or better yet 6 years ago at 245 instead of after I'd gained another 50, 60 lbs. I don't know if I will indeed lose 100, I hope I do.
Even if I had lost more with the band, say I was 200 I might consider getting sleeved. The odds are so stacked against us to keep the weight off. Frisco quoted a 5% chance I think it may be even less than that. There was a fascinating article in the NYT a couple weeks ago about this topic. If you search on the boards you will find it.
I am kind of envious of people who have less than me to lose too. I think if I had 150 or more to lose at this moment I would consider the DS. But that's just me.
I have less than 100 lbs to lose.
My reasons are the same as the "heavy weights." Multiple co-morbitities (hypothyroidism, high cholesterol, pre-diabetic, joint and back pain, etc.)
I'm 41 and I've tried more diets and exercise programs than I care to remember over the last 20+ years.
I wasn't always fat. Actually, I was one of those people who had a hard time seeing the fat person in the mirror for a very long time. Now, I have a hard time seeing the skinny-er person in the mirror.
I was lucky and got to watch a friend who is 10 years older than me have the surgery and get to her goal weight in just over a year. She is now about 10 lbs below her initial goal weight (WOOT! WOOT! for her!). Watching her lose with relative ease while I struggled through yet another diet is what did it for me.
This is just a generalization, but I think most WLS people just want off the roller coaster.
I started out with 102 pounds to lose to get to my ultimate goal. I have dieted since I was 7 years old. I went to Weigh****chers the first time in 7th grade. I did the Cambridge Diet at 18, went back to WW at 26, and on and on.... get the picture? Until I hit 30 I never had more than 25 to 30 pounds to lose, but each time I lost weight I gained back more. Eventually, in my thirties I got huge. Six years ago I got down to 199 for a minute and then it all crept back on over a two year span.
Without surgery I have about a 4% to 5% chance of maintaining any weight loss. With high blood pressure, high cholesterol, mild sleep apnea, joint pain, and lessened mobility and nearing 50 at my PCP's suggestion, I investigated WLS. For close to 40 years I have tried and tried to lose and then keep it off. I needed to change how I was doing this. The up and down is far too hard on the body. I wanted my BEST CHANCE to lose it and keep it off. The VSG was the answer for me.
So here's my answer: I'm no different from you except for the fact that I have fewer pounds to lose.
How to answer this question.... I too was a little put out when I first read it, but after thinking about it I realized you were really looking for answers. I am the oldest (that I know of) on this board at 65 and so I come from a different perspective. I have bounced between 175 and 232 for 30 years. I've been on the yo-yo bandwagon all of those years and have lost and gained at least 1000 lbs via every diet and exercise plan known. Slowly my arthritis was taking over my body and resulted in surgery on both thumbs and a knee replacement. I have 2 herniated lumbar discs and I knew a wheelchair was in my future. I pursued the lap band 5 years ago (sleeve was not offered then) and was turned away because of my age. I recently became a cancer survivor and with the backing of both my PCP and my Oncologist I moved ahead with my WLS. It's the best thing I've done for myself and even though I only have 70 or so more lbs to lose... it will literally save my life. I wish you only the best on your journey and I'll be cheering you on all the way.