How to Calculate your 'HAPPY WEIGHT'... (JUST FOR FUN)

Connie D.
on 7/12/08 10:27 am

???????it says my happy weight is 132. I weigh 123 and believe me I am happy!!

Hugs.....connie d

sweetsue617
on 7/12/08 11:02 am - Thunder Bay, Canada

Way to go, Sweetie!!  Nine pounds BELOW the Happy Weight is indeed reason to celebrate!!

You are one of the poster children for the surgery!

(((HUGS)) and

**SUE**

 

Bonnie_August
on 7/12/08 12:01 pm - Lino Lakes, MN

159 is my happy weight.  That is 6 pounds higher than my ideal weight of 153 calculated at the Dr.'s office.  I am currently at my ideal weight so I guess that's a good thing.  Thanks for posting this Sue.  I sure hope I get to meet you someday!

 

Bonnie

 

sweetsue617
on 7/12/08 12:14 pm - Thunder Bay, Canada

Congrats on being at your ideal weight!   I guess the main thing is that you're HAPPY with your weight loss!

I sorta think that 'set point' (see the article before this one..)--  where your body decides what weight you should be--does play a part of what number you ultimately end up at.  I think of Linda Anne and others who lose beyond what the medical profession deems 'ideal'.  I think their bodies stabilize at the weight they oughta be.

 

((And correct me if I am wrong, please, Linda Anne and Sandie!))

I would like to  meet you also, Bonnie!

Have a good weekend!

Rose1124
on 7/13/08 5:50 am - Inver Grove Heights, MN

I got 160, I think I did it right.

I honestly, can't imagine ever, ever, ever weighing 160. I guess also coming from a starting weight of 397, that just seems really untainable and a goal I honestly don't think I would ever strive for. I know many people have lost  100's of pounds, but I just can't imagine. But you never know, I can't imagine being under 300 pounds and at 3 months old I am 16 pounds away from that. Maybe as the weight comes off 160 would seem more realistic.

 

Rose

397/373/316/<300

Darla S.
on 7/13/08 1:00 pm - Maple Grove, MN

This is REALLY INTERESTING!   My "happy weight" calculated out to 174.  I think I'll be GIDDY once I go below 200!  My random number to shoot for has been 185, but even that seems a bit unrealistic for me right now...

I wonder if this takes into consideration the denser bones of the formerly fat, as well as the excess skin?  I'd guess not...   which might make my 185 just about right!


  Imperfect does not = unsuccessful

Most Active
Recent Topics
Valleyfair
kimtree · 0 replies · 2054 views
All In The Family
Darla S. · 1 replies · 1546 views
Any feedback on Park Nicollet?
SNCplus2 · 0 replies · 2997 views
10+ years out -
Darla S. · 2 replies · 2969 views
×