Tools of the trade
I use a scale and the medicine cups. For instance, this morning I took some chicken thigh and pureed it with some pasta sauce and ricotta cheese. I put it in 1 1/2 medicine cups. Then I decided to weigh it just for accuracy. After I tared 2 empty cups, I placed them on the scale and they weighed 1.8 ounces. At this stage, my surgeons plan calls for me to be eating between 1.5-2oz.
RNY - 4/17/13 HW - 463 SW - 428 CW - 263
No, it is not. All foods should be measured by volume (space). Your stomach only holds a certain amount of food - that is determined by space, not weight. Now, if you want to accurately determine the caloric breakdown of what you ate, then you might need to weigh your food (because most sources of nutritional data use weights). But if you are purely talking about the amount of food you are supposed to have at each meal, then you need to measure the volume, not the weight.
HW: 274 | SW: 232 | CW: 137 | Goal: 145 (ticker includes a 42 pound loss pre-op) | Height: 5'4"
M1: -24 (205) | M2: -14 (191) | M3: -11 (180) | M4: -7 (173) | M5: -7 (166) | M6: -8 (158) | M7: -11 (147) | M8: -2 (145) | M9: -3 (142) | M10: -2 (140) | M11: -4 (136) | M12: -2 (134) | M13: -0 (134) | M14: -3 (131) | M15: +4 (135) | M16: +2 (137)
Well, as a retired Chef I am pretty picky about those things. Certain things would not be a problem doing by volume. Your medicine cups is a great example. However, when considering measurements in our business 2 Tbsp equal an ounce. So, if I were to need to eat 1.5 - 2 oz and I was to eat between 3-4 Tbsp of food, this could be potentionaly be more food than I should be eating based on the density of the food. Those 3-4 Tbsp could certainly be more that 1.5-2oz when weighed.
I guess I am just really anal about these kind of things. LOL
RNY - 4/17/13 HW - 463 SW - 428 CW - 263