Recent Posts

Best of luck to you!!
I'm trying to assemble a complete, chronological time line of my Christmas portraits, starting with 2002 (7 weeks before my RNY) thru 2009.

I could not find my VERY FIRST post-op Christmas!

Until now! I found 2, in fact! They're part of my OH profile.
Oh happy day! Look for "Christmas Eve 2003."
Lovingly sent in this new year!

Lauralyn Lauralyn Bellamy, MA, MDIV, ct Dreamcoach
Self-sabotage stopped!
Learn more at: embodysuccesscoach.com
This journey may be long but at the end I see myself stronger and living a healthier and longer life. My prayers and best wishes for everyone here where ever they are on the journey to a healthier body.
I understand that this post is not about Joyce. I only posted about the incident to provide "proof" that sometimes MWG is "right on the money", when others were ganging up on her and saying that SHE was the liar. (Hmmm ... isn't something similar happening right now?) I don't have the time nor the inclination to research everything she says unless it it is helpful to me or someone I know. There has been other info MWG has put forth which also turned out to be absolutely true, but I feel no need to post further "proof" as some people believe what they want to in spite of evidence to the contrary.
I DO understand that many have a problem with her tactics, but I felt compelled to post some of the positives here because her info HAS helped me (and others that I have read), and no one else has stepped up to say that. I guess I am the only brave one. The rest must be afraid of the "gang mentality" I'm witnessing.
I read that someone thought MWG had called another OH member's employer to get her into trouble of some kind. That is indeed "crossing the line". Was that you? I think you said that you "suspect" it was MWG -- so where is your "proof"?
Whether or not you answer is irrelevant. You have made your point and I have made mine.
Happy new year!
The point I was making which apprently you missed is the differnce between MWG and myself is that I did not say I could PROVE it was her only that I suspected it was.
I don't post things as FACT unless they can be proved. Calling someone a suspect does not mean I can prove it was them, hence they are only a suspect.
Since it appears you have such a problem with my posts about MWG perhaps you could PM me rather than us continuing to hash this out on the boards.
I understand that this post is not about Joyce. I only posted about the incident to provide "proof" that sometimes MWG is "right on the money", when others were ganging up on her and saying that SHE was the liar. (Hmmm ... isn't something similar happening right now?) I don't have the time nor the inclination to research everything she says unless it it is helpful to me or someone I know. There has been other info MWG has put forth which also turned out to be absolutely true, but I feel no need to post further "proof" as some people believe what they want to in spite of evidence to the contrary.
I DO understand that many have a problem with her tactics, but I felt compelled to post some of the positives here because her info HAS helped me (and others that I have read), and no one else has stepped up to say that. I guess I am the only brave one. The rest must be afraid of the "gang mentality" I'm witnessing.
I read that someone thought MWG had called another OH member's employer to get her into trouble of some kind. That is indeed "crossing the line". Was that you? I think you said that you "suspect" it was MWG -- so where is your "proof"?
Whether or not you answer is irrelevant. You have made your point and I have made mine.
Happy new year!
The point I was making which apprently you missed is the differnce between MWG and myself is that I did not say I could PROVE it was her only that I suspected it was.
I don't post things as FACT unless they can be proved. Calling someone a suspect does not mean I can prove it was them, hence they are only a suspect.
on 1/1/10 6:21 am
I understand that this post is not about Joyce. I only posted about the incident to provide "proof" that sometimes MWG is "right on the money", when others were ganging up on her and saying that SHE was the liar. (Hmmm ... isn't something similar happening right now?) I don't have the time nor the inclination to research everything she says unless it it is helpful to me or someone I know. There has been other info MWG has put forth which also turned out to be absolutely true, but I feel no need to post further "proof" as some people believe what they want to in spite of evidence to the contrary.
I DO understand that many have a problem with her tactics, but I felt compelled to post some of the positives here because her info HAS helped me (and others that I have read), and no one else has stepped up to say that. I guess I am the only brave one. The rest must be afraid of the "gang mentality" I'm witnessing.
I read that someone thought MWG had called another OH member's employer to get her into trouble of some kind. That is indeed "crossing the line". Was that you? I think you said that you "suspect" it was MWG -- so where is your "proof"?
Whether or not you answer is irrelevant. You have made your point and I have made mine.
Happy new year!
This will be my last post on this thread. You apparently are missing the point since this is NOT about Joyce, NOT about who she does or does not work for and not even about Dr S.
My point was and will continue to be that MWG routinely lies, mistates facts, makes things up as they suit her and becomes markedly abusive when she is challanged. She sees herself as an expert on all things related to bariatric surgery in MX. She attempts to villify any surgeon that she does not approve of whether or not she has any experience with that surgeon or even knows anyone who has used that surgeon.
She retaliates against her detractors and takes things "outside" of the chatrooms to include calling someone's employer to complain about posts on this board.
I have no doubt about Gitt owning AWLS and it would not have taken a rocket scientist to find that "proof".
I choose not continue this thread.
on 1/1/10 4:13 am
This is OLD news, but I guess you missed the bruhaha on here about it.
Here is the link to the government website which finally proved that North Valley Plastic Surgery (Gitt's company) owned AZ Weight Loss Solutions (Schlesinger's practice) - of course, you may still find some fault with this "proof" that I am posting.
tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr
Each to his own. You would need to go back and read all the stuff on the AZ and revisions board back to the beginning of 2008 to get the whole story. You're coming at this a bit late.
Again, I understand you and many others have a problem with MWG's "tactics". She can have quite the sharp tongue. I still find her presence interesting, useful and yes, even entertaining!

Thank you Stacy.