RNY VS DS
BTW - I am losing weight with the RNY, only 30 -40 pounds to go and I am not quite 4 months out.
Good luck with your decisions!
If I had had a higher BMI, I would have chosen the DS without a doubt - I do believe you have to be highly motivated to be successful long term, with any WLS.
Your choice of surgery really is up to you - DSFacts is the best source of information - be sure to get an experienced surgeon as it is a much more difficult surgery than RNY.
Proud Feminist, Atheist, LGBT friend, and Democratic Socialist
Most insurance companies will pay for the RNY or the sleeve. These same insurance companies may not pay for the DS though. Fewer surgeons do the DS. Supplement requirements are higher, you need a strict regimine of lab work to check on vitamin levels, etc. I suggest you check to see if your insurance company pays for this surgery. And if so, discuss it thoroughly with the surgeon. The DS is typically done to high BMI people also, likely above 50. If I had a choice, I'd stay with the RNY I had. My wife had a somewhat similar surgery in 1980. She had constant diarrhea for most of the next 28 years, living on Flagyl to help deal with intestinal bacteria issues, and lomotil to help deal with the persistant diarrhea. Yes she could eat almost anything, but it came at a price. She was revised to a RNY in 2008. DAVE
Dave Chambers, 6'3" tall, 365 before RNY, 185 low, 200 currently. My profile page: product reviews, tips for your journey, hi protein snacks, hi potency delicious green tea, and personal web site.
From reading the info on OH, it does have a malabsorbtion component, so it isn't that different from RNY. I would not have considered the intestinal part due to polyps that were diagnosed when I was 43. I probably would not have been considered a candidate.
There are pluses and negatives to everything. As someone who is about ten weeks out, I have not experienced dumping on any food I've eaten. I've only gotten sick a few times from eating too fast. And there are only a few foods that have made me feel uncomfortable. (I call those my try again in a few weeks foods!)
Whatever you decide, good luck to you. I had the same dillemma with band vs. bypass. I'm sure you will make the decision that is best for you!
--Trish
WLS 10/28/2002 Revision 7/23/2010
High Weight (2002) 240 Revision Weight (2010) 220 Current Weight 115.
I seriously considered it because I started with a BMI of 57. I did not like the idea of even MORE vitamins than are already required for the RNY, having the remnant stomach removed, and the possibility of CONSIDERABLE issues with foul smelling gas and oily diarrhea (one of the first people I met who had the DS had a terrible time with both do those things, and even though other DSers say that is not typical, I know several DSers who do struggle with the diarrhea). In the end, I could live with any of the POSSIBLE side effects of the RNY, but was not willing to risk some of the POSSIBLE side effects of the DS.
Lora
14 years out; 190 pounds lost, 165 pound loss maintained
You don't drown by falling in the water. You drown by staying there.
The DS is very risky and there is a high mortality rate both during and years out from surgery. I was considering it because I'm diabetic and it is very effective for sugar control. There are a few surgeons near me who do it and are associated with great hospitals but , for me, the risk is too great relative to other WLS. The sleeve (VSG) came about as a standalone surgery after being done with the DS for years. It is showing promise as comparable to RNY for health benefits although weight loss is slower and not as high in the long term. But if dumping is a real concern for you it might be something to look into without being as risky.
Elisa