Why does WL Slow.......

frisco
on 3/24/14 5:52 pm, edited 3/24/14 6:24 pm

as you lose weight? and much slower as you approach goal?

Check out this nifty calculator for calories burned walking.

At 350lbs. at a normal pace I would burn 583 cals. in 60 min

At 150lbs. at a normal pace I burn 250 cals. in 60 min

To burn 583cals at 150lbs. I would have to walk 140 minutes.

You can question the numbers all you want, but I think the ratio is pretty correct as I think it really represents how much more energy we burn carrying the EW.

http://caloriesburnedhq.com/calories-burned-walking

frisco

 

SW 338lbs. GW 175lbs. Goal in 11 months. CW 148lbs. WL 190lbs.

          " To eat is a necessity, but to eat intelligently is an art "

                                      VSG Maintenance Group Forum
                  
 http://www.obesityhelp.com/group/VSGM/discussion/

                                           CAFE FRISCO at LapSF.com

                                                      Dr. Paul Cirangle

Imakitekat
on 3/24/14 7:13 pm - ID
VSG on 09/23/13

Thanks for posting Frisco, interesting and so cool, shows why we have to work out so much harder!

            
weese
on 3/24/14 9:19 pm
VSG on 02/26/14

Interesting...

.

     Lisa

Surgery 2/26/14 with Dr. Stephen Marshall in Peoria, Il

    

Julia HasHerLifeNow
on 3/24/14 9:36 pm
VSG on 10/09/12

Or simpler than that - it slows because we start eating too much or/and the wrong things? Maybe?

View more of my photos at ObesityHelp.com 5ft0; highest weight 222; surgery weight 208; current weight 120

     

    

califsleevin
on 3/25/14 12:42 am - CA

That's the other side of the coin, and is more the gist behind the notional six month honeymoon period. The calorie burn rate from exertion is in continual decline from the time we start losing weight. Together they become the perfect storm (wait, don't we need three things for a 'perfect storm'? Maybe that's the metabolic damage, or 'fat trap' from which we all suffer to varying degrees?)

1st support group/seminar - 8/03 (has it been that long?)  

Wife's DS - 5/05 w Dr. Robert Rabkin   VSG on 5/9/11 by Dr. John Rabkin

 

(deactivated member)
on 3/25/14 1:40 am

I think both are true.  We learn to eat around our sleeve, and we need fewer calories to sustain our weight. 

howarli
on 3/25/14 11:13 pm - MD

oh yea!!

                                    
Kathy8429
on 3/24/14 9:56 pm

Since February my weight lost has screeched to a crawl.  It coincides with my 6 month anniversary as well.  But you can't argue with math.  

Luvs2Cruise
on 3/24/14 11:05 pm
VSG on 10/30/13

Thanks for posting.  Interesting!

VSG on 10/30/13 Surgeon: Erik Throop    "There are plenty of difficult obstacles in your path. Don't allow yourself to become one of them." ~ Ralph Marston

 

 

HW: 447 YIKES!!!! SW: 293  CW: 140 GW:140?  100% on Plan -100% of the time!!!

Losses by Months: (5' 1") WL Pre-Op-154  M1-28​, M2-12, M3-18, M4-15, M5-14.5, M6-13.5, M7-10, M8-13, M9-14, M10-10, M11-1 (What the heck??)  M12-4as of today's date     

Lemily
on 3/25/14 12:06 am
VSG on 01/16/14

I am not a nutrionist, doctor, or trainor. But i would think that it takes less energy once you are smaller to do the same thing when you are larger. Think, you aren't moving as much of you around as you do now with the extra weight off. Look at it this way, when you use lighter weights you burn less or work your muscles less than when you use heavier weights.

In addition, your body does not need as many calories once you are smaller and in shape. Your body needs the right foods to function vs. all the extra calories that we used to eat.

    
Most Active
Recent Topics
15 years and I?m back
Maureen K. · 1 replies · 2205 views
runny nose
psren13 · 4 replies · 2368 views
×