Question:
I need to choose between open and laproscopic proceedures. Any Advise?

If I choose an open proceedure, my surgeon will automatically remove my gall bladder. With a laproscopic procedure, the recovery time is less, but I have to wait four weeks longer for the procedure. I am leading toward laproscopic, but I wanted opinions of people who have gone through the proceedures already.    — Amy C. (posted on January 2, 2005)


January 1, 2005
Its well worth the wait to avoid the possiblity of future surgery. My surgeon says about 1/3 of opens get a incisional hernia, LAP is near zero. Thats because in opens the muscle wall is cut, and they are left permanetely weak:( Add faster recovery, fewer hospital days, etc. Do pick a highly experienced LAP surgeon preferentially one who has done at least a 100 surgeries LAP. It takes lots of skill and experience to do it safely.
   — bob-haller

January 1, 2005
Make a list of the risk vs benefits. If you can get your gallbladder removed at the same time it would eliminate another surgery and anesthesia. Abdominal muscles have to be cut with lap also--just not as large a cut. Many obese people have hernias. Wearing a binder and following lifting restrictions will greatly decrease your chance of getting an incisional hernia. I had an open RNY and my gallbladder was removed and I was back to work in 3 weeks. A fair number of WLS patients have to have their gallbladder removed within a year post op. Discuss all your options with your surgeon. Consider time off work and recovery from 2 surgeries vs one etc. Good luck.
   — dianne E.

January 1, 2005
It is well worth the wait for the laproscopic procedure. I have 7 tiny scars from mine and I was up and functional in days. With the open, the recovery period is longer and you're more prone to developing blood clots because of the inactivity. My surgeon did not remove my gall bladder at the time of my LAP RNY, and I had to have it removed almost one year to the day of my original surgery, but he did it laproscopically at that time. You might ask about having it done as well. Many surgeons don't want to remove a healthy gall bladder if there are no problems, but with my RNY patients, it's only a matter of time til it goes bad.
   — Cathy S.

January 1, 2005
I chose open because at the time it took less time for the surgeon to do open than laps and I wanted my family spared the 'wait' time. He also took out the gallbadder, which if you keep your - there is a HIGH risk you'll have to have a second surgery within this year...putting the 'recovery' time for both of these surgies, isnt that much different from open.. In addtion, since my surgeon was in there, he looked around, turned out I had a large ovarian cyst I didnt even know I had, and he removed that too.. a bonus. Even if you 'pick' lap just remember there is no guarantee you'll stay a lap. There are pros/cons to each.
   — star .

January 2, 2005
I just had a lap done on 12/29. I had my gallbladder taken out at the same time plus repair of a hiatal hernia and liver biopsy. Because of all that I had done the pain was very intense for the first 48 hours, however every day is better. I think in two or three day the pain will be barely perceptible. In an open the muscles are cut which is more painful because they are so vascular and because you use your stomach muscles every time you sit up, rollover or go from a lying to sitting position. And in the first 2-3 days when they get you up to walk every 2 hours you will think you are being tortured by some sadistic guard instead of a nurse who just wants to make sure you don't get pneumonia or a pulmonary embolism(a blood clot that moves from another area , usually the thigh or groin and moves to the lungs. Pulmonary embolisms are usually fatal and easily preventable, heparin and walking, walking and more walking. The other downside to an open is that there is more blood loss and increases the chance that you might have to have a transfusion. They can remove your gallbladder laprascopically at the same time as your gastric bypass. However sometimes you don't have a choice, the doctor may decide to do an open once you get in the operating room if he thinks it will be too difficult to do a lap- 1 reason is when patients gain weight prior to surgery and the fat around the liver increase making it hard to get around in there. Good luck.
   — pammatria

January 2, 2005
I had mine done LAP and recovery time was great I hardly used the morphine pump was in surgery for 2 hours 2mins surgery was at 10 AM had some scar tissue from a previous surgery that had to be delt with that took the extra time was back in my room by 2 PM and was up walking the halls that evening had the surgery on Wed home on Fri afternoon. I took a pain pill when I left the hospital for the ride home because I live 1 1/2 hours away and never took another one went shopping the next day and really everyday because the weather was bad so went to the stores for long walks and did short walks in the house. I didn't drive though for the 2 weeks the Dr recommeded even though I felt well enough too. But do your research and choose a Dr who is well trained in Laproscopic procedures if that is your choice my surgeon I chose was doing Advanced Laproscopic procedures before he ever started doing WLS so I felt very confident that he knew his stuff. And if your Dr does OPEN and that is who you like then I would say go with an OPEN but do whatever you are comfortable with and don't let anyone tell you what to do make up your own mind. Good luck on your journey...Nancy
   — nefish

January 2, 2005
I had my rny lap, almost 2 years ago. My recovery has been text book for the most part. I have had other surgeries open in the past and have done well with them, but if I had my preference I think I'd wait for the lap. I don't see why the surgeon can't take the gall bladder along with doing the rny, as many surgeons do. My gall bladder was removed 16 months after my WLS, also lap, by my WLS surgeon. Although it was a real "nothing" surgery, I would have ideally preferred to have it all done at once, but my surgeon also does not like to remove healthy organs. I think that if I could convince my surgeon to take the gall bladder with the WLS, I'd definitely wait. Best of luck !!!!
   — Fixnmyself

January 2, 2005
Hi Amy, I am 3 1/2 years post-op. I had a lap. I, unfortunately, have been blessed with the "Queen of Scar Tissue" title. LOL. Seriously, I have had many complications, none life-threatening, just annoying. I have a tendency towards developing alot of scar tissue. I have gone through 8 endoscopies so far because my stoma keeps closing up. I am actually calling my surgeon today to schedule another. I always know when it is time, but I also have an ulcer at the anastimosis (forgive me if I have used the wrong term here) which does not help at this point. Now, I have been told, that with an open, patients seem to have less complications with strictures. I cannot tell you if it was another patient or a physician that told me this, but I have since heard it from others as well. You should ask your surgeon about this if there is any tenedencies toward scar tissue build-up in your family. It would not hurt to ask. Now, if your surgeon laughs when you ask, I will die a thousand deaths and bury my head in shame! LOL. Seriously, I am not trying to scare you or change your mind, but I guess I am trying to say that when you do make your decision, just remember to take into consideration how others in your family have reacted to surgery, physically, and emotionally. Something to mull over. Best wishes and God Bless!
   — Sheila K.

January 2, 2005
Amy- The laparascopic procedure is a better procedure-- from reduced risks of incisional hernias and wound infections to faster recovery time, there a multitude of sound reasons why the National Institute of Health termed the laparascopic RNY the "gold standard" for weight loss surgery. There is no increased risk of any complication of any kind (including adhesions, internal hernias or blockages) from the laparoscopic procedure vis-a-vis the open procedure. Secondly, less than 20% of people who rapidly lose weight develop gall bladder disease and less than half of them will need to have their gall bladders taken out; therefore, basing a surgical decision on avoiding an operation that you are likely not going to need doesn't seem to make sense. Lastly, as some of the other posters have already commented, there is a world of difference between having surgery as someone who is morbidly obese and having surgery as someone who is in a healthier weight category. Therefore, even if you are in the minority of people who will need to have your gallbladder removed, it would not become a problem for at least 6-8 months (provided it is healthy today) and the surgery then would be routine day-surgery.
   — SteveColarossi

January 2, 2005
I'm glad I did the LAP procedure. Very small scars - the largest was the size of a half dollar next to my belly button. When I had my plastic surgery, they cut off almost all of those scars so you lose them anyway. Even if you have to have your gallbladder taken out later (I had mine done a year after my tt), since it was done LAP also, the scars are again, very minimal. Much better then if done open.
   — Patty H.

January 2, 2005
I would wait for the lap. What Steve told you is exactly right. No surgeon should be removing healthy organs, so I would not base your decision on that. What usually determines if you go Lap is the size of your liver (part of the liver is over the top portion of the stomach, and if the liver is very fatty, it can be difficult to do the surgery via Lap.) Of course, all of this assumes that your chosen surgeon is experienced with Lap surgeries and that you are actually an appropriate candidate for a Lap procedure. If you do choose the Lap procedure, the four week wait could be quite an advantage to you-- you have time to start doing a higher-protein, lower carb eating plan, and maybe starting a walking regimen, which is something you will ned to do after the surgery.
   — lizinPA

January 3, 2005
If your surgeon is experienced with lap, I would wait and go that route. I have no noticable scars. As long as you take your actigall, there's a great chance that your gallbladder will be fine. I still have mine 3.5 years later.
   — mom2jtx3

January 3, 2005
A lap is almost always the best way to go. This decision should be made by your surgeon as an open procedure should only be done when there is too much abdominal fat for a lap to be done safely or in the event of a fatty, enlarged liver that could possibly be damaged during a more confined lap procedure. Keep in mind that the larger the incision, the more muscle that is being cut, the more adhesions etc etc GOOD LUCK!!!
   — Barbara F.

January 3, 2005
If it was me the only way I would wait is because he or she has almost a 100% success rate of doing LAP on people your size or larger. You are only a 47+ BMI so LAP should be fairly easy as long as the surgeon has tons of experience at it. As for statistics. Talk to people in his support group to see what the complication rate has been from LAP. There is a greater risk of things not getting closed up as tight, but it is rare for someone who does LAP regularly. <p>I was a 65.3 BMI and my surgeon would not even consider it at that time - almost 2 years ago. However, there was a surgeon about 75 minutes away that would try it but there was no guarantee and it was an 8 months wait just to get into see him. I went with the guy who I felt most comfortable with and got me in within a very short time. I had open and do not regret it at all. My open incision is now gone since extensive PS and the vertical incision is barely noticeable. <p>I did not find my recovery from open to be unbearable. LAP would have been great but I also wanted to make sure my surgeon could see what he was doing and get in and out fast. The larger you are the greater the risk of anesthesia, so shorter is better.
   — zoedogcbr

January 3, 2005
I had an open rny at the Bariatric Treatment Center (now known as Barix)in Ypsilanti MI. I am very pleased with my recovery from surgery, I was back to work in 2 1/2 weeks. Barix has an excellent post op eating plan so I adapted well and I have no problems 2 years later. (My experience with their support groups and leaders was terrible though!) I have several friends who had the Lap procedure and they still have problems eating meat and different types of things. I still do not eat any refined sugar, but can tolerate everything else and I have done well at maintaining my loss. I dont really know or understand if the procedure makes any difference in what you can tolerate. I did have an incisional hernia repaired last June, but prior to my surgery I had had gall bladder surgery and (2) hernia repairs without mesh. I had gall bladder surgery in 1994 and I was about 80lb lighter than when I had WLS in 2002, they removed the gall bladder by Lap procedure and noted how difficult the procedure was due to the excess weight I carried in my gut area. Because of this past experience there was no way I would even consider a Lap for WLS , I had a 55 BMI. I feel the WLS is very risky and I was very lucky coming through it with flying colors. I would do it again in a heart beat--- and I would have it done open.
   — debmi

January 3, 2005
Find out what your surgeon is most comfortable with. How many of each has he/she performed? Personally, I went with an open RNY. I wanted the surgeon to actually lift the organs and inspect them for leaks. When doing a lap on morbedly obese patients, very often they are working at the end of the instruments capacity and with the mortality rate associated with WLS, I perferred not to take any chances. That was just my rational. My recovery was quick and I am very proud of the scar I have. It is a visiable reminder that my life has changed for the better -- besides with all the stretch marks I have, what was another scar? :-D
   — coffenut




Click Here to Return
×