Why did you choose DS?
I was close to 500lbs. There is no other procedure that even affords the possibility of my losing enough, even if I don't get down under 200lbs. I lost 200lbs, but then stopped being at all disciplined. Gained 49 lbs back but have already losy 20 of that getting back on track.
Based upon the mechanics of the procedure, it left my stomach functioning the most like it was originally designed to.
I knew I needed the stronger malabsorption of the DS. But still it does not completely override or "by-pass" your own will or control and that was very important to me. I didn't want a procedure that did all the thinking for me and that was my perception of the RNY. I still am responsible for making good food choices, but have the luxury of being very bad on occasion. Though, there is a price to pay. . . but I have the choice.
That's it in a nutshell for me.
The RNY scared the crap outta me. Still does. And frankly, it's track record isn't do good.
But bottom line---I knew I would always NEED NSAIDs, and---I like to EAT. The DS was the only form of WLS that was compatable with taking NSAIDs, eating well, and achieving and MAINTAINING a significant weight loss.
7.5 years later, I know that I made the right choice for me.
Ruby
tazmaddy34 is my HW/SW/CW/GW 346/335/183/150 5'4.25"
I considered RNY, however as I researched and visited the revision boards I noticed not only were there many bandsters seeking revisions but a high number for RNYers as well. This alarmed me. When I learned about the DS, the higher success rates of keeping off the weight, the lack of a pouch, and the value of keeping the pyloric valve I was all in!
Also, as wls has gained popularity I've personally known many RNYers who are struggling with massive regain. They returned to strict dieting and heavy exercise to try to lose the weight. I knew that would be me. If the malabsorption of the RNY starts to reverse, I'd be one to regain. And while revision are all complicated, RNY revisions are much more complicated than a band revision.
Here's what I tell people about how I chose the DS:
I was originally on track to have RNY back in 2002, but got derailed after preop testing revealed that I had pulmonary hypertension. It's a long story, but it's on my profile if you'd like to read about it.
Even though I was off the track for RNY, I continued to attend the program my then-surgeon required of all his patients. I'd paid for it, so I figured I could benefit from it anyhow :-).
I saw some disturbing trends there. This was a big group, as several surgeons sent patients to it. There was, of course, a cadre of very successful patients (all RNY). They finished their year of program and went on with their lives, and as far as anyone knew/knows, all is well.
There were a surprising number of people, though, who fought and fought and fought to comply with what was expected of them, and the weight didn't come off well. At every meeting, there was word of someone else in the hospital with this or that problem--usually an ulcer or a stricture.
I listened to stories of dumping episodes, of getting food stuck episodes, of the mental/emotional challenges of having to live on highly restricted diets.....and I thought, "There's not a chance in hell I could live with this." (I should add that I have a major vomiting phobia. I'll do just about anything to not vomit. Not a good thing in some cases.)
Well, time passed, I got fatter and sicker, and eventually (again, story in my profile), it came out that the pulmonary hypertension was caused by the fat on my torso squashing my heart and lungs. It went from, "You cannot have any surgery at all," to, "You must have surgery or die."
I came back here to OH, feeling desperate because the lap band wouldn't give me enough weight loss to have any real hope of curing what was ailing me, and the RNY seemed to me like foolish butchery for not enough good results.
Someone told me then about the duodenal switch, invited me over to the DS board, which at the time was pretty much brand new, and the rest was history.
What I like about the DS:
1. 98% cure rate for type II diabetes. This was a major biggie because I had very bad diabetes.
2. Normal stomach anatomy and function is maintained. The stomach is reduced in size, but the normal stomach outlet, the pyloric valve, remains intact and functioning. There is no "stoma" with the DS or the vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).
3. The intestinal changes that are done in the DS "jump start" the body's metabolism. Mine was shot to hell from a lifetime of PCOS, dieting and other factors.
4. I'd already done many years of low fat, low carb, highly restrictive dieting and I knew I sucked at it. The DS gives an eating quality of life that I find easy to live with: eat a primarily animal protein based diet. I'm a happy carnivore :-). I had to learn to restrict my carb intake, but it was a lot easier to do when I could eat meat, cheese, fish, eggs, etc. with abandon, with little regard for fat content. (DS'ers only absorb about 20% of the fat they eat, so for most of us, fat is almost a "free" food.)
I felt so strongly about the superiority of the DS to any other procedure that I traveled and paid out of pocket to have it done, rather than have the RNY done fifteen minutes from home and covered by insurance. It's been four years, and so far, so good :-).